This week’s lecture brought a rather controversial subject
to the surface—animal experimentation. I learned that not only are animals
confined to a life of manipulation in the name of science but also in the name
of art. Scientists and artists both experiment with animals to further
knowledge of how DNA and other biological concepts operate and affect
organisms and as a way to express personal perspective of what human creativity is.
http://www.peta2.com/achievements/heartbreaking-mission/ |
Both Joe Davis and Eduaro Katz used advanced scientific
knowledge to experiment on animals with claims of artistry. While Joe Davis’s
experiments seemed to have a tinge of desire to further human knowledge, Katz’s
experiment was seen as “interesting but silly” (Lecture 1). Artists are
continuing to have a growing interest in scientific matters that can somehow
portray a piece of art, as seen in the growing Symbiotica group of 2000
(Lecture 2). However, because artists are strictly using these methods to bring
them to fame in the art community is unethical.
I feel that although scientists have reasons for
subjecting animals to horrific environments—to further the world’s knowledge
about humans and other living organisms, and potentially save human lives— both scientists and artists should be heavily limited to the treatments they are able to subject animals to. Although this may be seen as human creativity,
I think there should be more restrictions for how humans can treat other
animals. I feel that human creativity should be reduced to testing only those
who are willing to participate in the potentially dangerous experiments.
Two perfect examples of ethical science and artistry can be seen through Kathy High (Lecture 3) and Orlan (Lecture 4). Kathy High studies the human
immune system using white blood cells implanted in a petri dish. Rather that
subjecting animal cells, she uses actual human cells to study the behavior of
the human immune system (Kathy High Website). Orlan uses her own body as her
medium of art and to further interest in the art of the human body. She does not subject animals to life-altering surgeries or experimentation for her own artwork. She is the only
medium involved in her self-expression of art, and she clearly is willing to go
through with these surgical experiments. It is selfish and unethical to abuse
animals for one’s personal desire to express artwork or human knowledge. If a scientist or artist wants to embrace human
creativity, it should be done using willing participants rather than those
with no voice.
"Kathy High:
Visual/media Artist, Independent Curator, Educator." Kathy High: Projects.
Web. 04 May 2016. <http://kathyhigh.com/projects.html>.
Uconlineprogram.
"5 Bioart Pt1 1280x720." YouTube. YouTube, 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 04 May
2016. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaThVnA1kyg>.
Uconlineprogram.
"5 BioArt Pt2." YouTube. YouTube, 17 May 2012. Web. 04 May 2016.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdSt-Hjyi2I>.
Uconlineprogram.
"5 BioArt Pt3." YouTube. YouTube, 17 May 2012. Web. 04 May 2016.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EpD3np1S2g>.
Uconlineprogram.
"5 BioArt Pt4." YouTube. YouTube, 17 May 2012. Web. 04 May 2016.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qSc72u9KhI>.
I like how you brought up instances of artists who use more ethical means of scientific experimentation. As demonstrated in your blog, sometimes within the science community ethics get pushed aside for the sake of new discovery. It was cool to see two examples of scientists who found a way to experiment without having to harm an animal in the process.
ReplyDelete